The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 5765 of 2008 for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear despite counsel's attempts to contact him.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5765 OF 2008
Between:
G.V.S.Sreenivasa Rao, S/o.Narauyana Rao, Aged 50 Years, Occ: Agriculture R/o.Takkelapadu Jaggaihpeta Post & M Krishna District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the orders of the 1®* respondent - Deputy Commissioner Endowments Kakinada Dt.26-08-2003 passed in O.A 154/2001 as illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and against to the principal of Natural justice.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2008fWPMP. NO: 7499 OF 2008)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of the operation of the orders of the 1st respondent -
Deputy Commissioner Endowments Kakinada Dt.26-08-2003 passed in O.A 154/2001 during the pendency of the WP.
I.A, NO: 2 OF 2008fWPMP. NO: 15285 OF 2008)
Between:
Varakolu Janardhan Rao, S/o.Seshagiri Rao Proclaiming Managing Trustee of CTentela Narayana Rao-Seethamma Charitable Trust (Regd) R/o.Takkelapadu Jaggaiahpet (P&M) Krishna District.
...PETITIONER/3^‘' RESPONDENT
AND
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 in the writ petiton
Petition under order 7 rulel 1 CPC praying that inthecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to reject the WP No. 5765/2008 on the file of this Hon'ble Court as not maintainable with costs of the petitioner in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI B. CHINNAPA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI PARSA ANANTH NAGESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI Y. VENKATESWARLU The Court made the following: ORDER
1
APHC010233942008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI m3
[3310]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY .THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5765/2008
Between:
G.v.s.sreenivasa Rao
...PETITIONER
AND
The Deputy Commissioner and Others ...RESPONDENT{S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.BCHINNAPA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.CHALLA AJAY KUMAR
2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
3.PARSA ANANTH NAGESWAR RAO
4.YVENKATESWARLU
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Mr.B.Chinnapa Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through virtual hearing and submits that he made several attempts to contact
2
the petitioner, but the petitioner is not turn up,assuch, he is unable to proceed further.
matter.
- Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.
//TRUE COPY// Sd/- A. ViJAYA BA3U ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
SECTION OFFICER
Cnr
HIGH COURT
DATED:07/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.5765 of 2008
X 2 3 APR 2025
^ . Curteni Seciion
"CSPATCW^-^
DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
G.V.S.Sreenivasa Rao
Deputy Commissioner Endowments
Varakolu Janardhan Rao
K. Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
