Tupakula Sambasiva Rao, v. The Government of A.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed writ petitions seeking mandamus against police interference in a civil property dispute. Court, upon hearing only the respondent side who stated police advised parties to approach the court, closed the writ petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's writ petition closed without costs; pending miscellaneous applications also closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HI(3H COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 34499 OF 2014
Between:
Tupakula S^imbasiva Rao,, S/o. Late Ramaiah, Aged about 54 years, R/o. Door No. 2-133, Chinnaogirala, Vuyurru Mandal, KrishnaDistrict.
...PETITIONER
AND
- The Government of A.P., Rep by its Principal Secretary,Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
- The Superintendent of Police, Krishna, Krishna District.
- The Sub-Inspector of Police,, Vyurru Rural Police Station, Krishna District.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the illegal and arbitrary interference of police in a civil property dispute warrants a writ of mandamus.
Whether alleged threats by police in a civil matter constitute a violation of natural justice requiring judicial intervention.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tupakula Sipmabasiva Rao
- respondent
The Government of A.P.
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Krishna
- respondent
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Vyurru Rural
- respondent
Tupakula Venkata Naga Siromani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/34499/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court