This order allows the withdrawal of a writ petition challenging the closure of a joint bank account due to the death of a co-owner, and dismisses the petition as withdrawn without costs.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition and dismiss the same. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON
BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 33783 OF 2022
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
of the Constitution of India praying that in Petition under Article 226 the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may the circumstances stated in Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the be pleased to issue a the action of Respondent Nos. 2 nature of Writ of Mandamus in declaring bank account bearing number and 3 in not closing the joint savings the amount of the Petitioner No.2 and 144410100064689 and releasing wife of Petitioner No. 1 who is deceased is iilegai and arbitrary and release all the amount consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to
V, in the joint account of the Petitioner No. 2 and hisdeceasedmothertothe Petitioner herein.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 and3toenterthename of Petitioner No. 1 in place of deceased person forjoint account bearing number 144410100064689 in Andhra Bank (presently Union Bank), Nunna Branch, Vijayawada forthwith.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI K. V. ADITYA CHOWDARY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SMT. V. DYUMANI, SC FOR UNION BANK OF INDIA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 ; SRI RANGA SURYAPRAKASH RAO KOLA
The Court made the following: ORDER
/
APHC010552942022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3329] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY .THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 33783/2099 Between:
Shaik Pentu Saheb and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Union Of India and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petltioner(S): 1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.RANGA SURYA PRAKASH RAO KOLA The Court made the following: ORDER:
In view of the letter dated 12.09.2024 filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner before the Registry, requesting to post the matter under the caption for withdrawal, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition, permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pendinginthe petition shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY// SD/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
To,
One CC to Sri K. V. Aditya Chowdary, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Smt. V. Dymani, SC for Union Bank of India [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Ranga Surya Prakash Rao Kola, Advocate (OPUC) 4. Three C.D. Copies.
Cnr
HIGH COURT
DATED:18/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.33783 of 2022
AND»f^
* 01 OCT 202'!
^ * Current Section
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Shaik Pentu Saheb and Others
Union of India
Government Department of Financial Services
Senior Branch Manager, Union Bank, Nunna
Branch Manager, Union Bank, Andhra Pradesh
Venkateswaru Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
