A contempt case alleging willful disobedience of an earlier writ order was closed after respondents reported that the amount claimed by the petitioner had been paid and compliance was complete.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATJ^/J^^C^y
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER jo(\f’(|
o
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
★
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1056 OF 2024
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of CourtsAct 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondenthereinU/s10to12of Contempt of Court for willful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P. No. 21552 of 2023 dated 29-11-2023. Between:
M. Sreenivasula Reddy, S/o M.Rami Reddy, Aged about 29 years, R/o H.No.3-31, Chinnaipally, Mudumala, YSR Kadapa.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the PetitioneriSRI M KARIBASAIAH
Counsel for the Respondents No.1,3 & 4: SMT S SIVA KUMARI The Court made the following:
APHC010081782024
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH IN THE HIGH at AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TUESDAY .THE TWO thousand AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE rnriTFMPT NO- 1056/20.24
Between;
...PETITIONER
M Sreenivasula Reddy
AND
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar and Others
...CONTEWlNOR{S)
Counsel for the Petitioner;
1.M KARIBASAIAH
Counsel for the Contemnor(S);
1,S SIVA KUMARl
The Court made the following.
\
the HON’BLE SR/ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NI/VIIVIAGADDA CONTE/VIPT case Mr>. 105^024
order
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 29. 11.2023 passed by this Court i in W.P.No.21552 of 2023. When the matter is taken behalf of the petitioner. up for hearing, there ISi no representation on
Learned counsel for the respondents furnished written instructions dated 05.09.2024, wherein it i IS stated that the amount claimed by the petitioner was paid. In view of the same, the order dated 29.1 1.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.21552 of 2023 has been complied with, and hence. no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case to costs. ISi closed. No order as
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
SD/- V. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT DATED:17/09/2024
ORDER
CC.No.1056 of 2024
^ 07DEC?02'. I
OESpAT^sS^
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents wilfully disobeyed the High Court order dated 29-11-2023 in W.P.No.21552 of 2023.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Sreenivasula Reddy
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Principal Secretary, Irrigation and CAD Department
Sri S.S. Rawat, Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department
Sri Reddy Sekhar Reddy, Superintending Engineer, TBP Division
Sri G. Saileswar Reddy, Executive Engineer, TBP Division
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
