In a contempt petition filed under the Contempt of Courts Act for wilful disobedience of a writ order, the High Court observed non-appearance of the petitioner. Finding that the respondent had complied with the impugned order by passing a speaking order on 17.11.2023, the Court closed the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT^^^^^V' y TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER o ulP®; ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR o
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5145 OF 2023
Contempt case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the Contemners herein for the willful and deliberate disobeying of the orders of this Hon’ble Court dated 27.12.2022 in W.P.No.41837 of 2022.
Between:
Shaik Tippu Sultan, S/o. Shaik Ahmed Saheb. Aged about68 years, Occ. Senior Assistant (Retd) O/o. The Tahsildar, Madanapalie Mandal, Annamayya District, R/o. H.No.13/213, Meat Market Street, Madanapalie. Annamayya District (Erstwhile Chittoor District).
...PETITIONER
AND
Smt. Shaik Mahaboob Chand, Tahsildar, Madanapalie Mandal Annamayya District.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI B KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI G V S KISHORE KUMAR
The Court made the following:
[3329]
i
APHC010442402023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5145/2023
Between:
Shaik Tippu Sultan
...PETITIONER
AND
Shaik Mahaboob Chand
...CONTEMNOR
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.B KRISHNA
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1.G VS KISHORE KUMAR
The Court made the following:
f
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5145/2023
ORDER
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwillfuldisobedience of the orders dated 27.12.2022 passed by this CourtinW.P.No.41837of2022.
“Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court is of the considered view, the present Writ Petition can be disposed of directing the 3''^ respondent herein to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 12.04.2021, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of six(6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. ”
I
“As per Service Register, the individual was worked at Mulakalacheruvu Mandal during the period of 06.07.1994 to 31.01.1995. In view of above position, it is requested to submit your remarks on above points for regularization of the leave period of petitioner from 01.02.1995 to 31.05.1995 while worked at Mulakalacheruvu Office at an early date probably within one week for filing counter-affidavit in C.C.No.5145 of 2023. Please treat this very urgent. ”
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
SDI- V. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
nm
►
HIGH COURT DATED;17/09/2024
ORDER
CC.No.5145 of 2023
7 0 5 DEC 2021 ^Co m
O ^
^ Current Section
Pespatc;^-*^
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaik Tippu Sultan
Shaik Mahaboob Chand
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
