Writ petition sought consideration of representations to perform religious ceremonies including lifting of sandal pot at A.S. Peta dargah. Counsel sought leave to withdraw; permission granted and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) y ♦ WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR -
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 19680 OF 2074
Between:
S G N Fayaz Ahmad, S/o. Yousuf Miya @ Nawabjan R/o. Mahal Street, A.S. Peta, S.P.S.R. Nellore District.
...PETITIONER
AND
Vijayawada - 520 001.
Peta, S.P.S.R. Nellore District.
A.S.Peta, Nellore District.
...RESPONDENTS -
Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated i in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may
be pleased to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the respondents no. 1 and 2 in not considering the representations dated 03.08.2024 and . ' 12.08.2024 submitted by the petitioner seeking to permit the petitioner to perform religious ceremonies and duties including lifting of sandal pot etween 11,09 2024 to 13,09,2024 and from 29,09,2024 to 01 10 2024 at respondent no, 3 dargah as illegal, contrary, unconstitutional, contrary to the settled principles of law and consequently direct the respondents no. 1 to 2 to consider the representations dated 03.08.2024 and 12.08 2024 and permit the petitioner to perform religious ceremonies and duties including lilting of sandal pot between 11.09.2024 to 13.09.2024 and from 29.09.2024 to 01.10.2024 at respondent no. 3 dargah.
lA NO: 1 OF 9n9A
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i m support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 0, no, 1 to 2 to consider the representations oi the petitioner dated 03.08.2024 and 12.08.2024 pending the final disposal of the writ petition
lA NO: 2 OF
Between:
Shah GulanNakshabandNafees Pasha, S/o. Late Shah Gulam Nakshaband Ghouse Mohiuddi n, R/o. 0pp. Dargah Mahel Gate Mahel Street, A.S. Peta, SPSR Nellore District - 524304. ■•■"'^P‘-EAD PETITIONER/ PROPOSED RESPONDENT NO.5 AND 1. s G , P3yaz Ahmad, S/o, Yousuf Miya @ Nawabjan, R/o, Mahal Street A S, Peta, S,P,S,R, Nellore District,
Welfare, 4th floor, Imadadghar, Vijayawada - 520 001
Vijayawada - 520 001.
A.S.Peta, Nellore District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i - in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed S'" Respondent as Respondents No.5 in the main writ petition as well as the miscellaneous applications in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner; MS. K. TANUSHA, ADVOCATE
representing SRI D S SIVADARSHAN
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: SRI SHAIK KHAJA BASHA Counsel for the Respondent No.4; SRI RAVULA NAGARJUNA
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010391422024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
[3329]
1/
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 19680/2024
Between:
S G N Fayaz Ahmad ...PETITIONER
AND
The Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.D S SIVADARSHAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.RAVULA NAGARJUNA
2.GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
3.SHAIKKHAJA BASHA
The Court made the following:ORDE^
- Ms. K.Tanusha learned counsel representing Sri D.S.Sivadarshan, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of
this court for withdrawal of the writ petition.
- Permission as sought for is accorded.
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
Sd/- V. SAVITHRI GOWRI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECT10N't)FFICER
To,
[OUT]
TF
HIGH COURT
DATED:18/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.19680 of 2024
<br>15 FE9 S
A Currbt'u ;»0Ciion
^fc£^SPATCVA€<> ;
dismissing the w p AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner could withdraw the writ petition seeking permission to perform religious ceremonies at the dargah.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S G N Fayaz Ahmad
The Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board
The Chief Executive Officer, A.P Wakf Board
A.S. Peta Mosque and Tombs
SGN Hafeez Pasha
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
