The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as infructuous after the petitioner submitted that the cause no longer survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 33144 OF 2016
Between:
Smt. Vijaya Sree, W/o Suresh, Aged 43 years, Occ. School Assistant (Telugu Pandit), Zilla Parishad High School, Kakaraparru, Tanuku,WestGodavari District.
...PETITIONER
/
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the 4*^ Respondent in trying to interfere with the Petitioner's life and liberty as wholly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and direct the 4*^ and 5*'^ Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioner's life and liberty and allow the Petitioner to stay at Hyderabad or any other place wherever the Petitioner like to be staying without any interference in the interest of justice.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 40979 OF 2016)
-;-v
.’K-. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court rTT% be pleased to direct the 4‘^ and 5*' Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioner's life and liberty and allow the Petitioner to stay at Hyderabad or any other place wherever the Petitioner like to be staying without any interference in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AVADESH NARAYANA SANGHI FOR SRI PRATAP NARAYAN SANGHI ' Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : SRI N. CHANDRADHAR RAO The Court made the following: ORDER ^
m
(
APHC010104742016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3310] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 33144/2016
Between:
Smt. Vijaya Sree
...PETITIONER
AND
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.PRATAP NARAYAN SANGHI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.735/N CHANDRADHAR RAO
2.GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.AvadeshNarayana Sanghi, learned counsel representing Mr. Pratap NarayanSanghi,learned counsel for the petitioner(s) appeared virtually throughVideoConferencing and submits that the cause in the present writ petitiondoesnotsurviveand it has become infructuous.
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
closed.'
Sd/- M. PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Cnr
w
HIGH COURT
DATED:18/04/2024
ORDER
WP.No.33144 of 2016
o
M 2 5 FEB 2C25
^ . Current Section . ^
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Smt. Vijaya Sree
State of Andhra Pradesh
K. Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
