The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a mandatory direction for police protection of the petitioners' landed property and an injunction against interference by private respondents.
Liberty granted to approach police station for protection; Writ Petition disposed of without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 32804 OF 201 fi
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
(Respondents 5 & 6 r are permanent residents of Katikapalli H.W, SR ' Puram Mandal, Chittoor District)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated i in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action the 4th Respondent in not providing Police protection to the Petitioners i - in respect of their landed property of an extent of Ac.4.59 cents i m respect of the 1st Petitioner and extent of Ac.4.94 cents i m respect of 2nd Petitioner, situated in Sy Nos.235/2 235/1, 234/3 . 234/5, 235/3, 235/4 234/4, 234/1 of Thippinaidupalli Village Accounts, SR Puram Mandal, Chittoor District , as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to law and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to provide forthwith Police protection to the Petitioners in respect of the said landed property and also direct the private Respondents 5 to 7 not to interfere with the Petitioners possession and enjoyment of the said property, in terms of the injunction order dt. 15.05.2015 in lA No.381 of 2015 in OS No.55 of 2015 on the file of the Hon ble PrI Junior Civil Judge, Puttur, Chittoor District and with all other consequential benefits. LA. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP Mn- Annaa OF 20161 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim directions directing the Respondents 2 to 4 to provide Police protection to the Petitioners in respect of their landed property of an extent of Ac.4.59 cents i in respect of the 1st Petitioner and
extent of Ac.4.94 cents i in respect of 2nd Petitioner, situated in Sy Nos.235/2, 235/1, 234/3 234/5, 235/3 235/4, 234/4, 234/1 of Thippinaidupalli Village Accounts, SR Puram Mandal, Chittoor District, in terms of the injunction order dt.15.05.2015 in lA No.381 of 2015 in OS No.55 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Puttur pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI M.V.S. NIKHIL KASHYAP REP FOR SRI. V JAGAPATHI
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondents 5 & 6: SRI T JANARDHAN RAO
The Court made the following: O^DER
APHC010103222016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3310] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO .THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 32804/2016
Between:
Guramma And Anothers and Others ...PETITIONER(S)
AND
PrI Secretary Home And 6 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.VJAGAPATHI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GPFOR HOME(AP)
2.11781/T JANARDHAN RAO
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of theConstitutionofIndiafor
the following relief;
“...to issue a Writ Order or direction particuiariy one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus deciaring the action the 4th Respondent in not providing Poiice protection to the Petitioners in respect of their ianded property of an extent of Ac 4.59 cents in respect of the i Petitioner and extent of Ac 4.94 cents in respectof 2nd Petitioner situated in Sy Nos 735/2, 235/1, 234/3, 234/5, 235/3, 235/4, 234/4, 234/1 of Thippinaidupalii Viiiage Accounts, SR Puram Mandai, Chittoor District, as arbitrary, iiiegai and contrary to iaw and consequentiy direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to provide forthwith Poiice protection to the Petitioners in respect of the said landed property and also direct the private Respondents 5 to 7 not to interfere withthe
|
Petitioners possession .„ o»,, J” "•Other'■"order•'-<- C,V„
/
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- P VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
high court
*>ATED; 18/04/2024 \ t- 0
\
ORDER WP.IVo.32804 of 2016
disposing the WfP WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a permanent direction for police protection regarding their landed property.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Guramma.
K. Baby.
State of Andhra Pradesh,
Superintendent of Police,
Circle Inspector of Police,
Station House Officer,
DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
