The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous by Justice K. Manmadha Rao when counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause no longer survives.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010035872016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
TUESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 45634/2016
Between:
Kocherla Chiranjeevi,
...PETITIONER
AND
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
ORDER :
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Y.Sudhakar, learned
counsel for the petitioner(s) appeared virtually through Video Conferencing and submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
closed.
______________________________
DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
Gvl
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.45634 of 2016
Date : 16.04.2024
Gvl
Kocherla Chiranjeevi
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
