A writ petition was taken up for hearing; counsel submitted the cause no longer survived. Recording this, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous, closed pending interlocutory applications, and made no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3310]
APHC010054552020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3225/2020
Between:
Shaik Hussain
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Ap and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr T.Kuladeep, learned
counsel representing on behalf of Mr Srinivasa Rao Narra, learned counsel for
the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed
as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands
closed.
_________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
Date: 20.11.2024 TM
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
W.P.No.3225 of 2020
Date: 20.11.2024
TM
Shaik Hussain
The State Of Ap and Others
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
