The High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, on November 19, 2024, dismissed the petition as infructuous upon counsel's submission. No interlocutory order passed regarding costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010206652014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
TUESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 15994/2014
Between:
M.sudhakar Rao,
...PETITIONER
AND
The Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.E V V S RAVI KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.V T M PRASAD
2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following:
ORDER :
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
2
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.
_________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
Date: 19.11.2024
ARR
3
HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
Writ Petition No.15994 of 2014
Date: 19.11.2024
ARR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives the present proceedings.
M. Sudhakar Rao
The Government Of Andhra Pradesh
K. Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
