Writ petition dismissed as infructuous on the petitioner's counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives; interlocutory applications closed and costs not awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3310]
APHC010427292014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 12245/2014
Between:
Tammana Venkata Sathi Raju, Kakinada
...PETITIONER
AND
Prl Secy Endowments Dept Hyderabad 3 Others and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.K ARVIND KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.V T M PRASAD
2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following:
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr K.Arvind Kumar,
counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed
as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands
closed.
_________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
Date: 19.11.2024 TM
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
W.P.No.12245 of 2014
Date: 19.11.2024
TM
Tammana Venkata Sathi Raju
Prl Secy Endowments Dept Hyderabad
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
