Writ petition challenging the non-initiation of recruitment for the post of Shramic by APSRTC was withdrawn by the petitioners with the Court's permission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 31066 OF 2014
Between:
( The above named petitioners address Door NO; 43/50-5, Prakasnagar colony, Yarrmukkapalli post, Kadapa District.)
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may
be pleased to issued a Writ, order or directions more in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in not initiating steps for recruitment for the post of Shramic in 2nd respondent Region as per the notification dated; 23-12-2011 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and set aside the same and further direct the respondents herein to complete the recruitment for the post of shramics at 2nd Respondent Region in the 1st respondent corporation as per the Notification dated; 23-12-2011 forthwith in the interest of justice as otherwise the petitioners may suffer irreparable loss and hardship.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 38829 OF 20141
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to take steps for recruitment of shramics in 2nd respondent Region as per the Notification dated 23-12-2011 in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI P GOVINDA RAJULU
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SCFOR
APSRTC KKAC)
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010013712014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3457]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 31066/2014
Between:
M. Narasimhulu and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
A P S R T C Rep By Its Vc Md and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.PGOV1NDA RAJULU
CouT\se\ lor the Respondent(S);
The Court made the following:
r
2
w
Order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
- Permission is accorded.
- Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- U. SRIDEVI //TRUE COPY// ASSISTAN^^ISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
To
HIGH COURT DATED:05/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.31066 of 2014
’S>
I 2 UPR 2025
Current Seciion .
DISMISING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
M. Narasimhulu
C.Ramachandra
V. Raghuram Kumar
S. Sreenivasulu
A.P.S.R.T.C.
Regional Manager, APSRTC, Kadapa Region
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
