This order in Writ Petition No. 36268 of 2012 dismissed the petition seeking 30 marks for apprenticeship as illegal. The Court dismissed the matter for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 36268 OF 2012
Between:
K.Ayyanna, S/o.K.Linganna, Age;25 years, Occ;Contract Sharmik, R/o.Ganjikunta (V), Vajrakarur (M), Anantapur District.
...Petitioner
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for selection to the post of Sharmik by adding 30 marks towards undergoing apprenticeship in the selection process made pursuant to the notification dt: 1-11-2010 in Anantapur Region while awarding to the similarly situated
w
persons is illegal, arbitrary, in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to grant 30 marks under the head of pass in apprenticeship and consider for selection to the post of Sharmik in Anantapur Region in the interest of justice
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012fWPMP. NO: 46069 OF 2012)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to grant 30 marksunderthehead of pass in apprenticeship and consider for selection to the post of Sharmik in Anantapur Region in the interest of justice
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. S D GOWD
Counsel for the Respondents No.s 1&2: K VISWANATHAM (SC FOR APSRTC)
The Court made the following: ORDER
TT
APHC010117462012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3457]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
{
WRIT PETITION NO; 36268/2012
Between:
K.ayyanna
...PETITIONER
AND
The Vice Chairman Managing Director and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner;
1.S D GOWD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following Order:
On 01.03.2024 this Court directed the Registry to issuenoticetothe
petitioner as the learned counsel for the petitionerisnomore.
- Notice was served to the petitioner and the proof ofservicewasfiledon 16.04.2024.
- There is no representation for the petitioner today, and no steps have been taken by the petitioner for representing beforethisCourt.
2
I I
- Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.There
shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shallstandclosed.
Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
MSST
HIGH COURT
DATE0:04/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.36268 of 2012
c 0 3 APR 2025 r
ft .c»
^ . Current Section
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR
NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
K.ayyanna
The Vice Chairman Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C.
Harinath.N
B.Prasada Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
