A 2011 writ petition challenging APSRTC's refusal to consider the petitioner for a conductor post on domicile grounds, filed under Article 226, was closed in 2024 as the petitioner could not be served notice after his counsel passed away and took no steps for representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5008 OF 2011
Between:
Sri Baipalli Surya Prakash, S/o. B Papa Rao, Aged 39 years, male, Hindu, R/o. H.No.18-147/2, Sailipeta Street, Pedagadili Colony, Visakhapatnam
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings No. DY.SP(P)/R.T.I. Act(64)/10.R.M.V.S.P, dt.27.11.2010 issued by the 2 nd Respondent where he has not considered petitioner’s application for the post of conductors by stating that the petitioner is not a domicile of Visakhapatnam, in spite of his residing in Visakhapatnam since past 28 years and studied at Visakhapatnam, is arbitrary, illegal, capricious and violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 2'^'^ respondent to consider the petitioner’s case for appointment as conductor in the 2'"'^ respondent’s Region.
l-A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: fi197 OF ?n^■l)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased consider the petitioner’s case for appointing him as conductor by the 2nd respondent in any vacant post subject to the result of the writ petition and pending disposal of the writ petition.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 5703 OF
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition the High Court may be pleased to dispose of WP No. 5008/2011 out of turn in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P SATYANARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N SRIHARI (SC FOR APSRTC ) The Court made the following: ORDER
4
APHC010056402011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ¥M (SpecialATOriginalAMARAVATIJurisdiction) [3457]
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 5008/2011
Between:
Sri Baipalli Surya Prakash ...PETITIONER
AND
The A P S R T C Another and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1..
Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1. N SRIHARI ( SC FOR APSRTC )
The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel for the respondents is present.
- This Court, vide order dated 03.12.2020, issued notice to the petitioner, as the learned counsel for the petitioner had passed away. The notice sent by the Registry was returned unserved with the endorsement “not known”. The notice was sent to the address mentioned in the cause title. No steps have been taken by the petitioner for representation before this Court.
2
•>
order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
TF
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.5008 of 2011
CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Baipalli Surya Prakash
The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation
Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Visakhapatnam Region
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
