The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Petition No. 29857 of 2016 as infructuous based on counsel's submission without recording substantive arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t
THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :::: AMARAVAT (Special Original Jurisdiction) A
FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL fl® TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR \
PRESENT
the honourable dr justice k manmadha RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 29857 OF 2nifi
Between:
...Petitioner
AND
District.
Business, R/o D.No.3-6-6, Mukkadipeta t, Hindupur, Anantapur District
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Cohstitutioh of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the
3r.
nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in harassing the petitioner requiring him to attend the police station every day and threatening to evict the possession of property which is subject matter of O.S.No.03 of 2015 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur and forcing to compromise the civil suit with respondent No.4 and also preventing him from doing daily works in the said property as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 21, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioners by requiring him to attend the police station in connection with civil disputes.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 36950 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner by requiring him to attend the police station in connection with civil suit OS.No.03/2015 on the file of Senior Civil Judge Court, Hindupur, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.MAHESH NAIK REPRESENTING SRI
P.NARAHARI BABU
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
APHC010025792016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 29857/2016
Between:
N.M. Sadiq ...PETITIONER
AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.P NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following order:
Mr.S.Mahesh Naik learned counsel representing Mr.P.Naraharibabu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous, as such, no further orders are required in this matter.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending,shall
stands closed.
^ I ^ « 1-^ Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To,
i
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/04/2024
ORDER
WP.No.29857 of 2016
DISMISSING THE WP
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
N.M. Sadiq
The State of Andhra Pradesh
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
