Writ petition filed seeking investigation and CCTV footage is dismissed by the High Court as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 29621 OF 2016
Between:
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularlyoneinthenature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondentNos. 1 to 3 in not conducting Scientific investigation in FIR No.184/2016onthefileofthe 3rd respondent police station by way of securing C.C. footage regarding the withdrawal of the amount made by the petitioner on05-06-2016 at about 7.00PM from the ATM center of TATA INDICOM, Madanapalli, Chittoor District, from the TATA INDICOM office or State Bank of India, Kadiri branch or State Bank of India, Madanapalli branch andalsosecurethecall data information regarding the tower location of the cell phone numbers of the petitioners i.e, 9440510941, 7893176644, 7893327744 and 7893175544 respectively and also the other C.C. footages from the shops which reflects the movement of the petitioners in different places and thereafter file final report in accordance with law in the interest of justice. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016 (WPMP. NO: 36665 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to secure the call data information regarding the tower location of the cell phone numbers of the petitioners i.e, 9440510941, 7893176644, 7893327744 and 7893175544 on 05-06-2016 and also the other C.C. footages from the shops which reflects the
movement of the petitioners in different places pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. P NAGENDRA REDDY
/
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
• APHC010100612016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3310]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 29621/2016
\ I Between: T. Mahaboob Shareef and Others ...PETITIONER(S)
N.
AND The Superintendent Of Police and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.568/L J VEERA REDDY
2.GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following Order:
Mr.V.Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel representing Mr.P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive, and it hasbecomeinfructuous.
official respondents is present.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
/ /
SDI- K.SRINIVASA RAJU //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,
fr t
HIGH COURT
DATED: 19/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.29621 of 2016
anoh^
Xo 17 SEP 20?'. C9J
^ Current Section ^
'<^spatcv<SS^
DISSMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
T. Mahaboob Shareef and Others
The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Proddutur
The Station House Officer, I Town Police Station Proddutur
The State of Andhra Pradesh
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
