Dismissed
C. Raghu Ramaiah, v. the Depot Manager, Apsrtc & Another
Andhra Pradesh HCWP/2839/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER/o TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 2839 OF 2007
Between:
...PETITIONER{S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to I.D.No. 372 of 2002 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal Cum-Labour Court, Anantapur and quash the award dt. 23-4-2005 in so far as imposing the punishment of with holding of annual increments for a period of two years with cumulative effect and
denying the back wages and other monitory benefits by issuing appropriate Writ or direction more particualrly one in the natureofWritofCertiorari.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHAKERA BANU
Counsel for the Respondents: P VINAYAKA SWAMY
Counsel for the Respondents: ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FORAPSRTC KKAC)
The Court made the following:
APHC010048092007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3504]
FRIDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 2839/2007
Between:
C. Raghu Ramaiah,
...PETITIONER
AND
The Depot Manager Apsrtc Another and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SHAKERABANU
Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC)
2.P VINAYAKA SWAMY
The Court made the following:
I I
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.2839 OF 2007
ORDER:
There is no representation for the petitioner on 26.10.2024 and on 08.11.2024 and today also none appeared for thepetitionerdespite the fact that the matter is listed under the captionofdismissal. Sri Aravala Rama Rao, learned counsel for the first respondent is present. It shows that the petitioner is not interested to proceedwiththematter. Under these circumstances, this Court is inclined todismissthematter for default.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall standclosed. Sd/- U SRI DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
4. Three CD Copies
ss
%
ss
23/11/2024
HIGH COURT
DATED: 15/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.2839 of 2007
fe 21 MAR 2R25 S
^ . Current Section * %
DISMISSING THE WP FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
C. Raghu Ramaiah
The Depot Manager, APSRTC & Another
Maheswara Rao KUNCHEAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court