A 2008 writ petition listed as a Specially Identified Case was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioners, with no order as to costs and pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010044432008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3470]
FRIDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 26399/2008
Between:
B. Subrahmanyam & 9 Otrs. and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The Honble Central Administrative Tribunal Hyd 4 Otrs and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.D RAVISHANKAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
No representation for the petitioners.
Nos.1 to 3.
2
caption of ‘Specially Identified Cases’.
prosecution.
5. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also
stand closed.
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
NYAPATHY VIJAY,J
Date: 12.07.2024 TM
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 4626/2008
(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
Date:- 12.07.2024
TM
B. Subrahmanyam & 9 Otrs.
The Honble Central Administrative Tribunal Hyd
Respondent Nos. 2-4
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
