The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Petition No. 26162 of 2008 for want of prosecution without costs.
None. Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 26162 OF 2008
Between:
P. Bhaskar Rao, Chittoor District, S/o. Gopalakrishna Murthy Divisional Engineer (Retd.) A.P. Telecom Circle, Hyderabad, R/o. Tirupathi, Chittoor District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
mm
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may . berpleased to call for the records pertaining totheorderdated26.9.2007in 0.'A.No. 150/2004 of Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad \ Bench, and be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more A' ^ particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, holding the action of the Hon'ble Tribunal in dismissing the O.A.No. 150/2004 of the petitioner as bad in law, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the same and declare that the action of the respondents in imposing a penalty of reduction of pay by three stages on the petitioner with cumulative effect vide their order No.8/20/99-Vig.ll dated 31.12.2003 as illegal and arbitrary.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2008fWPMP. NO: 34246 OF 2008)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the final hearing of the writ petition in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. A RAGHU KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: RAJA SHEKAR RAO SALVAJI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: SRI S.JANARDHAN GOUD (SC
COUNSEL)
Counsel for the Respondents: DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: ORDER
iy
APHC010092252008
IN TtlE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3470]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 26162/2008
Between;
P. Bhaskar Rao, Chittoor Dist.
...PETITIONER
AND
Union Of India 2 Others and Others
i ' Counsel for the Petitioner:
...RESPONDENT(S)
(
1.A RAGHU KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.RAJA SHEKAR RAO SALVAJI
2.S JANARDHAN GOUD (SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT COU)
3.HAR1NATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA)
The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
No representation for the petitioner.
- This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.150 of 2004, dated 26.09.2007.
Nos;i and 3.
under the 4. The matter pertains to the year 2008 and is listed caption of ‘Specially Identified Cases’.
prosecution.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if anypending,shallalso
stand closed.
Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
S FFICER
To
HIGH COURT
DATED:12/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.26162of2008
S 0' APR 2025 a)
Current tieciien .
DISMISSING THE W.P FOR
WANT OF PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS
P. Bhaskar Rao
Union of India
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Nyathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
