S. Ravindranath v. S. Rajyalakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal of 2007 challenging a divorce decree was dismissed in 2024 for want of prosecution, with no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal of 2007 challenging a divorce decree was dismissed in 2024 for want of prosecution, with no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVl
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 117 OF 2007
Appeal filed under Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.12.2006 in O.P.No.190of2003onthefileof the Hon'ble Court of the 1 Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry.
Between:
S. Ravindranath, S/o. Upendranath, Aged about 48 years, Hindu, R/o.H.No.104, Kochar Apartments, Opp: Pantaloan, Begumpet, Hyderabad
...Appellant/Respondent
AND
S. Rajyalakshmi, W/o. Ravindranath, Aged about 46 years, Hindu, Housewife R/o. Mallayyapeta, Rajahmundry East GodavariDistrict
...Respondent/Petitioner
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. A Nagendra Rao Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared
The Court made the following:
■APHC010057782007
\
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3470]
THURSDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 117/?nn7
Between:
S. Ravindranath
...APPELLANT
AND
S Rajyalakshmi
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.A NAGENDRA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)
No representation on either side.
- This appeal was filed challenging the decree dated 30.12.2006 passed in O.P.No.190 of 2003 by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry in favour of respondent herein.
- The matter pertains to the year 2007 and has been listed under the caption ‘specially identified cases’.
p '
want of pros©cution”.
No ord©r as to costs.
As a s©qu©l th©r©to, nnisc©llan©ous p©titions, if anyponding,shallalso
stand closod.
SOI- E KAMESWARA RAO
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
- Th© 1 Additional Civil Judg© (Sonior Division): Rajahmundry,East Godavari District.
- On© CC to Sri. A Nagondra Rao Advocat© [OPUC]
- On© CC to th© Soction Officor, VR Soction, High CourtofA.P. Amaravathi.
4. Two CD Copies
SAM, SNS
HIGH COURT
DATED;11/07/2024
JUDGMENT
CMA.No.117 of 2007
??
XO j ft <?co '?m V
Co
^ Curreni Seciion . ^
DISMISSING THIS CMA FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Ravindranath
S. Rajyalakshmi
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court