The Writ Petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no representation was filed by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
<
THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND
TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 24903 OF 2006
Q
o
'4
Between:
G. Manoj Kumar, S/o. Sriram Prasad @ Ramu Prasad Aged 42 years, Male, Hindu, R/o. K.V. Ramana Rao, Sector-2, Plot No. 30, MIG-1, M.V.P. Colony, Visakhapatnam District.
...PETITIONER
AND
Armoured Vehicles Head Quarters,
Medak District at SangaReddy Andhra Pradesh.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and calling for the record from the respondents and quash the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad in OA No. 1060 of 2002 dt. 18-8-2006 confirming the proceedings passed by the respondents 1 and 2 in proceedings No. 02/00058/Estt/98/06 dt. 11-12-1999 and proceedings No. 66/Appeal/AVHQ/OFPM (MK) dt. 26-6-2000 respectively or to pass
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 31855 OF 2006)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispose of the writ petition expeditiously or to pass any other order or orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
The Court made the following ORDER:
[3470]
APHC010027142006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 24903/2006
Between:
G. Manoj Kumar, Visakhapatanam Dist. ...PETITIONER
AND
The AddI Director General Ordinance Factory Board ...RESPONDENT{S) Anothe and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)
No representation for the petitioner.
- Ms. M. Uma Devi, learned counsel for the Central Government for the
respondents is present.
the dismissal order dated 3. This Writ Petition was filed challenging Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in 18.08.2006 passed by the Central O.A.No.1060 of 2002.
2006 and has been listed under the 4. The matter pertains to the year caption ‘specially identified cases .
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto , miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also
stand closed.
Sd/-SHA1K MOHD. RAFl ASS1STA|NT REGISTRAR
//true copy// SECTION OFFICER
To,
Advocate [OPUC] N (P) Anjana Devi Satyanarayana 1, One CC to Sri. General Of India, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCS to Sri. Deputy Solicitor
3, Three CD Copies
JSS
WP-SS
HIGH COURT
DATED:11/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.24903 of 2006
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WANT OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.
G. Manoj Kumar
The Additional Director General, Ordinance Factory & Appellate Authority, Ordinance Factory Board
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Nyopathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
