Disposed

Krushi Vidya Niketan Diploma In Education (D.Ed.,) v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC12 Feb 2024WP/23/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A D.Ed college challenged rejection of its renewed affiliation and exclusion from DEECET-2014 web-counselling. Interim direction had required inclusion subject to a fire safety certificate. Counsel submitted the cause did not survive in view of that interim order; the writ petition was closed with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

None granted at final stage; interim inclusion in DEECET-2014 counselling list already operated under order dated 07.01.2015.

Krushi Vidya Niketan Diploma In Education… — Education and Admissions | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 23 OF 2015

¶5

Between:

¶6

Krushi Vidya Niketan Diploma In Education (D.Ed.,), Maivi Street, Allagadda, Kurnool District, Rep. by its Correspondent & Secretary Sri Shaik Jeelani Basha, S/o S.Abdul Khaliq, aged about 61 years, R/o Allagadda, Kurnool District.

¶7

...PETITIONER

¶8

AND

¶9

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, AP Hyderabad.

¶10

The Commissioner & Director of School, Education,^Governmentof Andhra Pradesh, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶11

The State Council of Educational Research &, Training, Rep. by its Director, Office at Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶12

...RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a "Writ of Mandamus"^{A.Todeclarethe} proceedings Rc.No.17/B/TE/SCERT/2014-2 dated 19.12.2014 served upon the Petitioner on 01.01.2015 issued by the 2nd Respondent rejecting the renewed affiliation of the Petitioner College for the academic year 2014-15, and consequent action of the 1st & 2nd Respondents in failing to include the Petitioner College in the list of colleges notified for web-counseling of

¶14

¶15

of D.EL.ED 2014-16 as per the notification DEECET 2014 of 2 Year course without jurisdiction, illegal, arbitrary and published on 31.12.2014 as being , 19(1) (g) and 21 of the unconstitutional and in violation of Art. 14 Respondents to grant renewal Constitution of India. B. To direct the affiliation for the period of 2014-18 as per the application dated|j)^0^2014 submitted by the Petitioner College.

¶16

I A. NO: 1 OP 2Q15(WPMP. NO: 24 OF 201^

¶17

151 CPC is filed praying that in the Petition under Section circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ^petition,the direct the Respondents to include the name High Court may be pleased to of the Petitioner College in the list of colleges approved^{andappendedto} □EEqET-2014 for the course of D.Ed for academic the web-counseling of year 2014-16^{pendingthedisposaloftheabovewritpetition.}

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. N ASHWANI KUMAR

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶21

[3333]

¶22

TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶23

PRESENT

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶25

WRIT PETITION NO: 23 OF 2015

¶26

Between:

¶27

Krushi Vidya Niketan Diploma In Education (D.Ed.,),^Malvi Street, Allagadda, Kurnool District, Rep. by its Correspondent & Secretary Sri Shaik Jeelani Basha, S/o S.Abdul Khaliq, aged about 61 years, R/o Allagadda,^Kurnool District.

¶28

...PETITIONER(S)

¶29

AND

¶30

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings,^AP Hyderabad.

¶31

The Commissioner Director of School, Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶32

The State Council of Educational Research, Training, Rep. by its Director, Office at Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶33

...RESPONDENTS

¶34

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue^a"Writ of Mandamus A. To declare the proceedings Rc.No.l7/B/TE/SCERT/2014-2 dated 19.12.2014 served upon the Petitioner on 01.01.2015 issued by the 2nd Respondent rejecting the renewd affiliation of the Petitioner College for the academic year 2014-15, and consequent action of the 1st 86 2nd Respondents in failing to include the Petitioner College^inthelist

¶35

of colleges notified for web-counseling of DEECET 2014^of2Year course of D.EL.ED 2014-16 as per the notification published^on 31.12.2014 as being without jurisdiction, illegal,^arbitraryand unconstitutional and in violation of Art. 14, 19(1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India. B. To direct the Respondents to grant renewal affiliation for the period of 2014-18 as per^{theapplication} dated 0.06.2014 submitted by the Petitioner College,^andC.Pass

¶36

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 24 OF 20151

¶37

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to include the name of the Petitioner College^inthe list of colleges approved and appended to the web-counseling^of DEECET-2014 for tho course of D.Ed for academic year 2014-16, pending the disposal of the ?hove writ petition and^pass

¶38

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. N ASHWANI KUMAR

¶39

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION (AP)

¶40

The Court made the following:

¶41

At the stage of admission, on 07.01.2015 this Court passed an interim order, operative portion of the said order reads as under:

¶42

"there shall be interim direction to the respondents to include name of the petitioner-college in the list of colleges approved and appended to the web-counselling of DEECET-2014 for the course of D.Ed. for academic year 2014-16, on condition that the petitioner provides fire safety certificate within a period offour weeks. ”

¶43

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.Rithvika Koganti, counsel representing learned counsel for

¶44

the petitioner submitted that i in pursuance of the interim order dated 07.01.2015 granted by this Court, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive.

¶45

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition ISi closed. There shall be no order as to costs

¶46

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any.

¶47

shall also stand closed.

¶48

//TRUE COPY//

¶49

Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR

¶50

S raN OFFICER

¶51

To,

¶52

One CC to SRI. N ASHWANI KUMAR Advocate [OPUC]

¶53

Two CCs to GP FOR EDUCATION (AP), High Court Of^Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶54

Three CD Copies

csb

csb

high court

DATED;1 3/02/2024

ORDER

WP.No.23 of 2015

ANOfi^
,.g 7 7 JUN Mail s
' * Current SMtIon

¶62

CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS

Krushi Vidya Niketan Diploma In Education (D.Ed.,) v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krushi Vidya Niketan Diploma In Education (D.Ed.,) v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaya Educational society Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Siddireddi Venkateswara Rao, Vs Union of India

Gopikrishna Educational Scty,Ysr Dist Vs Govt.of Ap,Prl.Scy,P.Education,Hyd,and 4

The Ap Web Offset Printers Association Vs the State of Ap

Sri Lakshmi Offset Printers and Binders Vs the State of Ap

Correspondent, Viswam Educational Society, Spsr Nellore Dist Vs Prl Secy, Dept. of Higher Education, Hyderabad and 4 Others