Writ petition challenging permission to shift a college was closed by the high court. The court found the college no longer exists based on instructions from the Secretary.
The petition was closed with no orders for costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
The linked image cannot be display ed. The file may hav e been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. V erify that the link points to thecorrect file and location.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
TUESDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 11293 OF 2016
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ or Direction particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the A.P.State Council of Higher Education (2nd Respondent) not to accord any permission for shifting of Siva Educational Society (3rd Respondent), from Venkatagiri Mandal to Mayudupet Mandal SPSR Nellore District, violation of A.P.State Council of Higher Education Rules and contrary to the Notification dt.7.4.2015
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 16002 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the cause title and pass
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 14254 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the secretary A.P.State Council of Higher Education (2nd Respondent) to follow his Circular Rc.No. APSCHE/Acad Cell/Shifting/2015/Cir-I, dated 26-10-2015
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. K SANKARANARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondents: S PARINEETA
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP)
The Court made the following:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.S.Parineeta, learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent produced a copy of the instructions dated 12.02.2024 received from Secretary, APSCHE, wherein it is stated that the 2nd respondent who is the competent authority has not granted permission for shifting the 3rd respondent college vide Rc.No.APSCHE/Acadcell/Shifting/VSU/2016, dated 18.05.2017 and that the 3rd respondent college is currently not in existence.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
______________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Pnr/Ksj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the cause in the writ petition survives for adjudication given that the college is not in existence.
CORRESPONDENT, VISWAM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY
PRL SECY DEPT OF HIGHER EDUCATION HYDERABAD
Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh State Council of Higher Education
Siva Educational Society
Vikrama Simhapuri University
The Govt Degree College
V. SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
