Writ petition challenging a revision order in tribal land transfer proceedings; counsel submitted the land had been distributed among tribals so the cause no longer survived. The court recorded the submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 13380 OF 2nnQ
Between:
Satyanarayana Murthy Cultivation, R/0. Pulimeru, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District
...PETITIONER
AND
at '■ SkinKas'TGodrrDrtrla
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution Of India praying that in the Circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with the order of the 1st respondent made in Revision petition vide G.O.Ms.No.57 Social Welfare (LTR-2) Department
w
§
dated 05.06.2009, preferred against the order of the 2nd respondent in CMA No.30 of 1981, dt. 20.04.1990 in which the order of the 3rd respondent in LTRP No.828 of 1979, dated 19.02.1981 was confirmed, and quash them as illegal, null and void and consequently direct the respondents to drop all ^rther proceedings against the land of the petitioner of an extent of Ac.2.38 ^ cents on the Eastern Side in sy.No.78 of Thimmapuram Village Addateegala Mandal, East Godavari District.
I-A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 17387 OF ?nnQ)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of dispossession of the petitioner from the land an extent of Ac.2.38 cents on the Eastern Side in sy.No.78 of Thimmapuram Village, Addateegala Mandal, East Godavari District pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N SIVA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010062852009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3329]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 13380/2009
Between:
Tummala Ayyanna, E.g.dist.
...PETITIONER
AND
PrI Secy Social Welfare Dept 4 Others and Others
...RESPONDENT{S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.N SIVA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1 .GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
The Court made the following:
- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learnedcounselfor
the respondents.
- When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counselforthe petitioner submits that the lands already distributed among the tribals. Hence, the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
- Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendingshallstandclosed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/" K.J.RAJA bABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECT10N OFFICER
To,
TF
HIGH COURT
DATED: 17/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.13380 of 2009
of ANDf^
o
2 1 FEB 2025
Current Section
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tummala Ayyanna, E.g.dist.
PrI Secy Social Welfare Dept 4 Others and Others
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
