%% Counsel for Respondents submits 5. On the other hand, learned Sanding the competent authority for Gram Panchayat is not that the Respondent of the subject property, Respondent granting necessary permission in respect Therefore, the authority for granting such permission No.3 is the competent the law. He further is not valid as per permission obtained by the petitioner notice to the submits Respondent No.3hadonlyissuedashowcause to the Respondent submitted her explanation petitioner. Since the petitioner consideration for passing final 10.09.2024, the same is under Authorities on , the Respondents did not initiate any orders Without passing any final orders apprehended by the petitioner. proceedings or coercive steps as 6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for Respondents. that the record, it appears of the material placed on 7. On perusal of the subject land situated in the absolute owner and possessor petitioner is and Mandal, Nandyala District. Survey No.163/1 of Banaganapalli Village Respondent Gram Panchayat after having 8. It is further observed that the ,o conclusion that prima facie title and possession physical verification came was granted to the Accordingly, the permission over the subject land, dated 02.02.2021. sheds vide proceedings petitioner for construction of two Counsel for the Respondents, 9. As contended by the learned Standing competent Authority for granting Panchayat is not the the Respondent Gram is the competent Authority as per subject permission. But, Respondent No.3 is
