Disposed

M/s Krishna District Milk Producers Mutually Aided Cooperative v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC24 Sept 2024WP/1046/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of 38+ writ petitions based on a prior common order from WP No.7206 of 2021, setting aside impugned memos and directing respondents to entertain appeals and applications expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Impugned memos set aside; respondents directed to entertain appeals and applications regarding delay condonation expeditiously.

M/s Krishna District Milk Producers Mutually… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

APHC010014552020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3310] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO T H OUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶5

WRIT PETITION Nos: 940, 951, 955, 959, 962, 983, 985, 986, 993, 1001, 1006, 1014, 1024, 1046, 1571, 1573, 1611, 1612, 1615, 1619, 1626, 1947, 4014, 4061, 4118, 4123, 4124, 4125, 4144, 4145, 4147, 4157, 4169, 4225, 4228, 4245, 4250, 4283, 4389, 4411, 4495 and 7199/2020

¶6

WP No.940 of 2020

¶7

Between:

¶8

Krishna District Milk Produ c ers Mutually Aided Cooperative ...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The State Of Ap and Other s ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶11

1.A V S LAXMI

¶12

Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.

¶13

The Court made the following:

¶14

COMMON ORDER:

¶15

Today when the ma t ters are taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, these matters are squarely covered b y a common order passed by this Court in WP No.7206 of 2021 & batch, dated 2 6.07.2024,

¶16

and hence, requests this Court to pass similar order in these writ petitions also. The operative portion of the said order is as follows:

¶17

“.. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the cases and on considering the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, without touching the merits of the cases, in the interest of justice, this Court is inclined to dispose of the present writ petitions.

¶18

Accordingly, the all the Writ Petitions are disposed of. The impugned Memos in all the writ petitions are hereby set aside. Further, the 2^nd respondent is directed to entertain the appeals and applications to condone the delay and dispose of the same, as expeditiously, as possible, by affording an opportunity to the petitioners, in accordance with statutory provisions under law. “

¶19

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and upon perusing the entire material available on record, this

¶20

Court deems fit to dispose of these writ petitions in terms of the said order.

¶21

Accordingly, all the Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of the

¶22

common order passed by this Court dated 26.07.2024 in W.P.No.7206 of 2021 & batch. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶23

The Registry is directed to attach a copy of the common order

¶24

passed by this Court in W.P.No.7206 of 2021 & batch, dated 26.07.2024 to

¶25

this order. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶26

______________________________

¶27

DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.

¶28

Date : 25.09.2024

¶29

Gvl

¶30

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO

¶31

¶32

Date : 25.09.2024

¶33

Gvl

M/s Krishna District Milk Producers Mutually Aided Cooperative v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Krishna District Milk Producers Mutually Aided Cooperative v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Mula Rama Subbamma Vs The Government of A.P.

Kuruva Chinna Sanjanna, Kurnool District and 4 Oth Vs the Asst Commissioner, Endowments Dept, Kurnool Dist and Anr.

Kota Venkata Ramarao and 15 Others Vs State of Ap., Endowments Dept.,and 3 Others

G. Jashuva Murthy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

P. Ramana, Vs Prl.Secy., Industries and Commerce Dept., Hyd., and 3 Others

Tadigadapa Subba Rao Vs State