Writ petition challenging an auction notice dated 25.06.2012 by the Devasthanam over land in Guttapadu village was dismissed as infructuous on the petitioners' own submission that the cause no longer survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4\
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES::AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER,^^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
‘J
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 19466 OF 2012
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
Endowments Department, Endowments 1 The Asst Commissioner, Department, Kurnool district, Devasthanam, Rep. by its Executive Officer, f" 2. Sri Lingamaiah Swamy ■4 R/o. Orwakallu Village, Orwakallu Mandal, Kurnool District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied therewith,theHighCourtmay direction more particularly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or one in the nature of writ of Mandamus deciaring theimpugnedauction 25.06.2012 by the 2"“ respondent notice published in daily newspaperon is illegal, arbitrary unjustified, contrary to the law and violation of principles consequently direct the of natural justice and set aside the same respondent not to disposess the petitioners from the lands an extent of Ac. 4.78 cents in Sy. No. 82 of Guttapadu villae, OrwakalluMandal.Kurnool District
l A. NO: 1 OF 2Q12(WPMP. NO: 24957 OF 2012)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe impugned auction notice published in daily pleased to suspend the nd respondent pending disposal of the newspaper on 25.06.2012 of the 2 Writ Petition.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2Q13(WVMP. NO: 1453 OF 201^
Between:
Devasthanam, Rep. by its Executive Officer, Orvakal Sri Lingamaiah Swamy Village, Kurnool District
...Vacate Petitioner
AND
...RespondentsA/Vrlt Petitioners
...Respondent/Respondent
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt:28/06/2012 made in WPMP.No.24957/2012 in WP.No.19466/2012.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ARAVALA RAMA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI G.RAMANA RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010542772012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 19466/2012
Between:
Kuruva Chinna Sanjanna, Kurnool District & 4 0th and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The Asst Commissioner Endowments Dept Kurnool Dist ...RESPONDENT(S) Anr and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.G RAMANA RAO
2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following Order:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.AravalaRamaRao,
learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, thecauseinthepresentwrit petition does not survive, and it has become infructuous.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as Infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
2
shall stand miscellaneous applications pending, if any 3. As a sequel
closed.
SD/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED;24/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.19466 of 2012
O?
%
g 15 FEB 2025
^ , Current Section ^
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kuruva Chinna Sanjanna
Kuruva Anjaneyulu
Kuruva Alla Swami
Kuruvua Sunkanna
Kuruva Chinna Ayyaswami
The Asst Commissioner, Endowments Department, Kurnool District
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
