Second appeal dismissed for default due to appellant's non-appearance and lack of instructions. Court noted respondent's non-appearance. No order as to costs.
Second Appeal dismissed for default. No order as to costs. Interim orders vacated. Pending petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3369]
APHC010207512008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 1060/2008
Between:
Rachamalla Krishna Murthy
...APPELLANT
AND
Gudala Rama Rao
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.K V SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU
Counsel for the Respondent:
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT:
The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment
and Decree dated 21.07.2008, passed in A.S.No.16 of 2005, on the file of the learned IV Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Tanuku, confirming the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.773 of 2001, dated 04.03.2005, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tanuku.
the appellant appeared through Video Conference. None appeared for the respondent.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand
closed.
________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J
Date: 11.12.2024 M K K
Rachamalla Krishna Murthy
Gudala Rama Rao
T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
