Dismissed

Komma Jayamma v. Komma Yellaiah and Another

Andhra Pradesh HC16 Sept 2024CRP/6801/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court petition filed in revision regarding an execution petition. Court found no subsisting cause of action due to death of decree-holder and stayed proceedings was unnecessary. Petition dismissed as no further orders required.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as no further orders are necessary in the Civil Revision Petition pending a sequel of miscellaneous applications.

Komma Jayamma Vs Komma Yellaiah and Another — Property and Title | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

5Sias^

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6801 OF 2017

¶7

Between:

¶8

Komma Jayamma, W/o. K. Ramaswamy, Aged about 58 years, Occ.Agriculture, R/o. D.No.1-26-B, Thippayapalli (V), Pullapmpeta (M), Kadapa District.

¶9

...PETITIONER/J.DR.-2

¶10

AND

¶11

1.Komma Yellaiah, S/o. late Venkata Subbaiah, Aged about 60 years, Occ: Retd. Teacher, R/o.T.Agraharam Opposite to Railway^{Station,Rajampet} Town and Mandal, Kadapa Dist.

¶12

...RESPONDENT/DHR.

¶13

2.Komma Ramaswamy S/o.Chennaiah, aged about 60 years,^R/o.D.No.1- 26-B, Thippayapalli (V), Pullapmpeta (M), Kadapa District.

¶14

(R2 not necessary)

¶15

...RESPONDENT/JDR-1

¶16

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by the Order dated 04-07-2016 passed in E.P.No.107/2012 in O.S.No.13/2010 on the file of Principal Civil (Senior Division)Judge, Rajampet,

¶17

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP. NO: 8732 OF 2017)

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,^{theHighCourtmaybe} pleased to condone delay of 415 days in filing the^aboveCRP

¶19

LA. NO: 2 OF 2017(CRPMP. NO: 8733 OF 2017)

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,^{theHighCourtmaybe} pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No.107/2012 in O.S.No.13/2010 on the file of the Principal Senior^{CivilJudge,Rajampet} including sale of E.P schedule property house bearing^{N0.1-26-B,Tippaya} Village, Pullampeta Mandal, Kadapa District

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner ; MS M NEELIMA REPRESENTING^FORSRI J SREENIVASA RAO

¶22

Counsel for the Respondents : SRI M SHESHU REDDY

¶23

The Court made the following ORDER :

¶24

APHC010926452017

¶25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶26

[3460]

¶27

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶28

TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶29

PRESENT

¶30

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶31

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6801/2017

¶32

Between:

¶33

Komma Jayamma ...PETITIONER

¶34

AND

¶35

Komma Yellaiah And Another

¶36

...RESPONDENT

¶37

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶38

1.M. Neelima

¶39

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶40

1.M SHESHU REDDY

¶41

The Court made the following:

¶42

¶43

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6801/2017

¶44

ORDER:

¶45

The present Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning^theOrder dated 04.07.2016 in E.P.No.107 of 2012 in O.S.No.13 of 2010 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajampet, whereunder^the trial Court rejected the objections of the petitioner/D.Hr for^{saleoftheEPschedule} property.

¶46

Ms. M. Neelima, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner through virtual mode represented that the respondent^{No.1/DecreeHolder} had died and no steps have been taken in the Execution^{Petitionandas} there is no subsisting cause of action for adjudication,^{nofurtherorders} are necessary in this Civil Revision Petition.

¶47

Recording the said submission, the present Civil Revision^Petitionis dismissed.

¶48

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶49

S/D- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

The Principal Civil (Senior Division)Judge, Rajampet. 2. One CC to Sri. J Sreenivasa Rao Advocate [OPUC]

¶54

One CC to Sri. M Sheshu Reddy Advocate [OPUC]

¶55

THREE CD COPIES TAG

¶56

HIGH COURT DATED: 17/09/2024

ORDER

CRP.No.6801 of 2017

{■

fi 2 0 NOV 202‘( S
'V ★ CuiTenl StcUon ^ ^

¶61

DISMISSING THE CRP

Komma Jayamma v. Komma Yellaiah and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Komma Jayamma v. Komma Yellaiah and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Peyyala Sudhakar Vs Dara Bhagyaveni

Pinninti Ramakrishna, Vs Miriyala Hanumanthu

Mohammad Khaleel Vs Idgah Mohalla

Pandranki Parvathi Vs Thondarapu Lakshmi

Malireddi Sudarshan Reddy , Vs Malireddi Ramakrishna Reddy

Utukuru Venugopal Reddy Vs Kalidindi Rama Raju