Single judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 CPC as infructuous, holding that the petition no longer required adjudication due to subsequent developments.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2818 OF 7ni«
Petition under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, aggrieved by the order dated 16-2-2018 made in E.P No 129 of 2017 in O.S No 231 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge Kadapa Y.S.R District.
Between:
Utukuru Venugopal Reddy, S/o U.Venkata Subba Reddy, aged about 42 years occ: Colony R/o Door No 1/64 Alankhanpalli kadapa City Y.S.R.District
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/J.Dr
AND
Kalidindi Rama Raju, S/o K. Subba Raju, Aged about 49 years occ Bussiness R/o Door No 2/844, Nehru Nagar, Kadapa City Y.S.R District
...RESPONDENT/D.Hr/PLAINTIFF
lA NO: 1 OF 2nis
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the order dated 16-
02-2018 made in E.P.No 129 of 2017 in O.S. no 231 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge Kadapa Y.S.R District pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner;SRI V R REDDY KOWURI Counsel for the Respondent: —
The Court made the following:
[3460]
APHC010333942018
■
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2818/2018
Between:
Utukuru Venugopal Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
Kalidindi Rama Raju
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner;
1.VR REDDY KOWURI
Counsel for the Respondent;
The Court made the following;
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NY APATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2818/2018
ORDER:
Aggrieved by the Order dated 16.2.2018 in E.P.No 129of2017 in O.S.No 231 of 2016 passed by the Principal Junior CivilJudge,Kadapa, Y. S. R District, the present Civil Revision Petitionisfiled.
counsel, 2. It is represented by Sri N. Rupeswar Reddy, learned representing Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned counselforthePetitioneron record that in the light of subsequent developments,theissueintheCivil Revision Petition has been rendered infructuous andassuch,nofurther orders are necessary in this Petition.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, ifany,shallstand closed.
SDI- K. KASI RAO ACHARI assistant REGISTRY
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
nm
L
HIGH COURT
• ✓
V
i
^ DATED: 17/09/2024
♦ /
1 ' ) •
4
♦' %
/.
ORDER
CRP.No.2818 of 2018
OF
iia: 2 5 NOV 2"?’' mi i
\ o
^ ^ Currant Section
^^5i^SPATCVVj£g(#
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous given subsequent developments.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Utukuru Venugopal Reddy
Kalidindi Rama Raju
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
