Revision petition against an execution petition order; counsel reported the parties no longer wished to proceed, and the High Court dismissed the revision for non-prosecution with no order as to costs, closing pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2173 OF 2024
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to be above-named revision petitioners beg to submit this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition to the Honble High Court to call for and examine the records for the purpose of satisfying itself about the legality, regularity or propriety of and being aggrieved against the impugned order dated 21-6-2010 passed in EA NO. 133/2008 in Ep No. 81/2004 in OS NO. 1049/1991 on the file of the I A Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.
Between:
...PETITIONERS/(J.DRS.4&5)
AND
...RESPONDENT/DHR
2. P.Suribabu, (died)
...RESPONDENTS/J,DRS.1 TO 3
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M CHALAPATI RAO
Counsel for the Respondents : SRI D JAIPAL REDDY
The Court made the following ORDER ;
9
I
APHC011420102013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3460]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2173/2024
Between:
Pinninti Ramakrishna & Another ...PETITIONER
AND
Miriyala Hanumanthu And 3 Others
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.M CHALAPATI RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.D JAIPAL REDDY
The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CRP N0.2173 OF 2024
ORDER:
- The present Revision is filed questioning the order dated 21.06.2010 in E.A.No.133 of 2008 in E.P.No.81 of 2004 in O.S.No.1049 of 1991 passed by the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.
- At the time of hearing, it is represented by Mr.N.Baji, proxy counsel for Sri M.Chalapathi Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners that the parties are not interested to proceed further in thematter.
- Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any shall stand closed.
S/d- K. SRINIVAS RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
TAC
HIGH COURT
DATED:13/09/2024
ORDER
CRP.No.2173 of 2024
%
m c
^ 2 2 NOV 202*1
^ Current Section ^f
CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS DISMISSED AS NON-PROSECUTION
Pinninti Ramakrishna
Pinninti Syamala
Miriyala Hanumanthu
P.Suribabu (died)
Pinninti Kanthamma
Pinninti Appayyamma (died)
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
