The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed for default as notices served to all parties were returned un-served due to absence of recipients, preventing any further proceedings from being held.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3369]
APHC010291052006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4706/2006
Between:
G.hanumantha Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
B Rajamma and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.R V SUBBA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER:
The Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the petitioner against the Judgment and Decree dated 18.01.2005, passed in E.A.No.277 of 2004 in E.P.No.87 of 2003 in O.S.No.129 of 1991, on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Anantapur.
closed.
________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J
Date: 11.12.2024 M K K
G.hanumantha Reddy
B Rajamma
T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
