Criminal revision challenging dismissal of discharge petition. Court noted the main criminal case was already disposed of by acquittal, rendering the revision infructuous. The revision was dismissed as infructuous and interim orders vacated.
None. Revision dismissed as infructuous; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SATURDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS
.S
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 2015 OF 2014
Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr PC aggrieved by the orders passed in CrI.M.P.No.5755/2013 in C.C.No.437/2010 dated 18th June 2014, on the file of the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam.
Between:
Pasupuleti Venkata Murali Mohana Rao, S/o. Late Satyanarayana, Aged about 67 years, R/o.Plot No.42 Pandurangapuram, Visakhapatnam.
...Petitioner/Accused
AND
...Respondent/Complainant
i
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(CRLRCMP. NO: 3335 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Migh Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC.No.437/2010 on the file of the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan % Magistrate, Visakhapatnam.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAGESHWARA RAO PAPPU
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Criminal Revision Case No.2015 of 2014
ORDER:
The present Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner/accused against the order, dated 18.06.2014 in Crl.M.P.No.5755 of 2013 in C.C.No.437 of 2010 passedbythe learned IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam wherein the petition filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 258 of Cr.P.C., todischargehim was dismissed by the trial Court.
Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall standvacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, ifany shall stand closed.
SD/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. The IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam.
Trt sree
HIGH COURT
DATED:23/11/2024
ORDER
CRLRC.No.2015 of 2014
IS 2 ^ FEB 20?5
^ Curreni Section
DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Pasupuleti Venkata Murali Mohana Rao
The State of A.P.
Andenthapalli Veera Venkata Krishanan
V Srinivas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
