Petitioners sought quashing of proceedings in C.C.No.531 of 2017 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. With no representation when posted for dismissal, the High Court held the petitioners had no interest in prosecuting the case and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY SPM «1ZT
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR t\¥fe /io
PRESENT A
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9977 OF 2018
Between:
...Respondents/Defacto Complainants
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that inthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.531 of2017 on the file of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kavali, Nellore District, in so far as Petitioners/A.2 to A.4 are concerned.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that inthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings, including appearance of the Petitioners in C.C.No.531 of 2017 on the file of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kavali, Nellore District, in so far as Petitioners/A.2 to A.4 are concerned, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G Sundaresan, Advocate for the Petitioner and the PublicProsecutoronbehalfof the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Ganduri Nageswara Rao, Advocate for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following Order:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.9977 OF 2018
ORDER;
Despite the matter being posted under the caption ‘For
Dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners.
Therefore, it evinces that the petitioners have no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, the present Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendinginthis
Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
SD/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
%
//TRUE COPY//
CTION OFFICER
To, 1. The Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kavali, Nellore District 2. One CC to Sri G Sundaresan, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Ganduri Nageswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies ^ SVR sree
HIGH COURT DATED:10/01/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.9977 of 2018
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION
1 'L\2.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N. Jalaal
J. Banu
S. Vasanthi
The State of AP
Saleem Shaheeda Begum
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
