Dismissed

Chilukuri Santhosh v. Alluri Venkata Satyanarayana Raju

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Jan 2024CRLP/69/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed multiple criminal petitions seeking quashing of FIRs and stay of proceedings for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear and file representation. Pending miscellaneous petitions were subsequently closed.

What did the court decide?

Criminal petitions dismissed for non-prosecution; all miscellaneous petitions pending thereon stood closed.

Chilukuri Santhosh Vs Alluri Venkata… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT/§
/O

¶2

WEDNESDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7592 OF 2019. 69.79 and 141 of 2020

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7592 OF 2019

¶7

Between:

¶8

Chilukuri Santosh, S/o Satya Srinivasulu, Aged about 28 years, Hindu, Occ: B.Tech Student, R/o D.No. 18-10-3/4, near Old Registrar Office, Madhurawada, Vishakhapatnam,

¶9

Chilukuri Kaasi Annapurna, w/o Satya Srinivasulu, Aged about 48 years, Occ Business, R/o D.No. 18-10-3/4, near Old Registrar Office, Madhurawada, Vishakhapatnam,

¶10

Chilukuri Suman, S/o Satya Srinivasulu, Aged about 25 years, Occ Business, R/o D.No. 18-10-3/4, near Old Registrar Office, Madhurawada, Vishakhapatnam,

¶11

...Accused No. 1 to 3/ Petitioners

¶12

¶13

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi

¶14

...Respondent

¶15

Pulakhanda Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o Veera Reddy, Aged about Not known, Occ Business, R/o Kammapalem, Ongole Town, Prakasam^District

¶16

...Defacto Complainant

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the F.I.R./Crime No.246/2019 on the file of the II Town Police Station, Ongole, Prakasam District.

¶18

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2019

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings including the arrest of the Petitioners in FIR/CRIME No. 246/2019 on the file of the II Town Police Station, Ongole, Prakasam District.

¶20

—2.-

¶21

I.A, NO: 1 OF 7099

¶22

of Grounrir'^f perusing the Memorandum Vara P PfSements of Sri G VV S .hrcinToT " -

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 69 OF 2020

¶24

Between:

¶25

R/o "^h'^o^"'!;8-{’63®/3°' ^Adl'thvt^Nanar"' °P<=-^business, Lane. Madhuravada.Visakhapatna^ ® ' '^^S^rampalem Road, 2nd

¶26

...Petitioner/Accused No.1 AND

¶27

' sssaT™"s?..avXsssM^^^

¶28

o Th« o* * r A .. -Respondent/Complainant ■ Court SAnih“d:?h1?ASS^^^

¶29

. ■ -Respondent/Respondent

poKLI™ " ™ “ "•”»«

I.A. NO: 2 OF ?n7n

' S"

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to extend Interim order granted in CrI.P. No 69 of 2020, dated 07.01.2020 until further orders

¶35

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the^Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments^{ofSriGVVSVara} Prasad, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of Ms. Ayesha Azma S, Advocate for the Respondent No.1

¶36

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 79 OF 2020

¶37

Between:

¶38

Chilukuri Kasi Annapurnamma, W/o. Satya Srinivasulu, Aged about 55 Years, Occ Housewife, R/o. H. No. 18-103/3, Adithya Nagar, Nagarampalem Road, 2nd Lane, Madhuravada, Visakhapatnam

¶39

...Petitioner/Accused No.2

¶40

AND

¶41

Alluri Venkata Satyanarayana Raju,, S/o. Basava Raju, Aged about Years, Occ Business, R/ o. Ananthavaram Village, Tangutur Mandal, Prakasam District.

¶42

...Respondent/Complainant

¶43

The State of Andhra Pradesh,, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court of Andhra Pradesh, At Amaravathi., Guntur District.

¶44

...Respondent/ Respondent/

¶45

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in FIR No. 118 of 2019 of Jarugumalli Police Station, Prakasam District

¶46

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2020

¶47

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including Arrest of the petitioner in FIR No. 118 of 2019 of Jarugumalli Police Station, Prakasam^District.

¶48

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2022

¶49

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased Pleased to extend the interim order granted in CrI.P. 79/2020 dated 0701-2020 until further orders.

¶50

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the^Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments^{ofSriGVVSVara} Prasad,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Ms Ayesha Azma .S, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2

¶51

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 141 OF 2020

¶52

Between:

¶53

Chilukuri Sumanth, S/o. Satya Srinivasulu, Aged about 30 Years, Occ. Business R/o. H. No. 18-103/4, Madhuravada, Near Old Registration Office Visakhapatnam

¶54

...Petitioner/Accused No.3

¶55

AND

¶56

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶57

Alluri Venkata Satyanarayana Raju, S/o. Basava Raju, Aged about. Major, Occ. Business, R/o. Ananthavaram Village, Tangutur Mandal, Prakasam District

¶58

...Respondents/Complainant

LA. NO: 2 OF 2020

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be Pleased to extend the interim order granted in CrI.P.^{141/2020dated07-01-2020} until further orders.

¶64

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the^Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments^{ofSriGVVSVara} Prasad .Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public^{Prosecutoronbehalfofthe} Respondent No.1 and of Sri Ayesha Azma S, Advocate^forthe Respondent^No.2

¶65

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶66

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.7592 of 2019. 69. 79 and 141 of 2020

¶67

ORDER;

¶68

Despite the matter being posted under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶69

Therefore, it evinces that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, the present Criminal Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶70

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending^inthese

¶71

Criminal Petitions shall stand closed.

¶72

Sd/- M SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

To,

SECTION OFFICER

DiSrfcf Prakasam

o' House Officer, Jarugumalli Police Station Prakasam District. ^ W S Vara Prasad Advocate [OPUCl 4. One CC to Ms Ayesha Azma S Advocate [OPUC]

¶78

¶79

Three CD Copies Stu vna

fvia^’ioecn

HIGH COURT

DATED:10/01/2024

ORDER

CRLP.Nos.7592 of 2019, 69, 79 and 141 of 2020

¶85

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITIONS FOR NON- PROSECUTION

Chilukuri Santhosh v. Alluri Venkata Satyanarayana Raju

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chilukuri Santhosh v. Alluri Venkata Satyanarayana Raju

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

k Samba Siva Rao Vs The State of Andhara Pradesh

Barla Babu Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Vedurupaka Vinay kumar Vs The State of A.P

N.Jalaal Vs The State of Ap.

Chilukuri Kasi Annapurnamma, Vs Alluri Venkata Satyanarayana Raju

Chilukuri Sumanth Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh