A Section 482 CrPC criminal petition relating to Spl.S.C. No. 25 of 2018 (Kadapa); the petitioner's counsel made an endorsement that the main case was disposed of. Nothing remained for adjudication and the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\ ■
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8374 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
Jinka Ravi S/o Pedda Subbanna. R/o. D.No. 2/115, Near SBI Colony, Dorasanipalli Vil., Proddatur Mandal, YSR Kadapa Distfict.
...PETITIONER AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the Spl.S.C. No. 25 of 2018 on the file of the VI Additional District Judge Court cum Special SC ST Judge, Kadapa.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2ni«
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in Spl.S.C.No.25 of 2018 on the file of VI Additional District Judge Court cum Special SC ST Judge, Kadapa
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri VENKAT REDDY KODUMURY .Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 None.
The Court made the following Order
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8374 OF 2018
ORDER:
A.Likitha, learned counsel represented on behalf ofleam-ed counsel for the petitioner and submitted that maincase was disposed of. To that effect, learned counsel made an endorsement on the bundle.
In view of the said submission, nothing remains forfurther adjudication.
Hence, the present Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendinginthis
Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFICER
o’ VI Additional District Judge Court cum Special SC ST Judge, Kadapa. l. One CC to Sri. Venkat Reddy Kodumury, Advocate [OPUC] Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi [OUT] 4. I HKht C.D Copies.
SSL
AL
it / •
HIGH COURT
DATED:03/01/2024
ORDER CRLP.N0.8374 OF 2018
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS.
SSL
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jinka Ravi
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor
Smt. Kanneluru Sugunamma
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
