Petitioners sought to quash an FIR; by the time of hearing police had filed a charge sheet. Counsel requested liberty to challenge the charge sheet instead; the court granted permission and dismissed the criminal petition with liberty to assail the charge sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 839 OF 2018
Between:
...Petitioners/A3 & A4 AND
1223/A-1,1st floor, G.T.Road, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District.
...Respondent/Defacto Complainant
■82 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances ated in the l^morandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may M 2812-2017 on the file of IV are loiTcerned' Pet''oiers
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2ni«
stated Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances be of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may 28 12 2ni7^nn°.h®*n " FIR.No.338 of 2017 dated aaa ns?Dehf?„ne ® SPSR Nellore District in so far as against petitioners are concerned pending disposal of the petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C Subodh ,Advocate for the Petitioners and J the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Gandyadapu Rajesham Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.839 OF 2018
ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the present criminal petition is filed seeking to quash the FIR and subsequently, the police had laid a charge sheet after due investigation. Now, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court for liberty to assail the said charge sheet. Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed granting liberty
to the petitioners to assail the charge sheet.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this
criminal petition shall stand closed.
SD/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. The Station House Officer, Nellore IV Town Police Station, SPSR Nellore District. 2. One CC to Sri. C Subodh, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. Gandyadapu Rajesham , Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies Pmg
sree
N
HIGH COURT
DATED:02/01/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.839 of 2018
SCop'ks 2.q\z.\2j+
DSL
DISMISSING THE CRLP
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners may be permitted to assail the charge sheet laid after investigation instead of the FIR sought to be quashed?
H Ramaswamy Naidu
Subba Ramaiah
Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh
Siva Kumar Aluri
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
