Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging confirmation of maintenance quantum in M.C. No. 2 of 2011. Counsel for petitioner submitted the matter had become infructuous with an endorsement to that effect; the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5605 OF 2018
Between:
Thummadi.Bhadraiah, Working as Railway Diesel Driver, South Central Railway, Bidar, Secunderabad Division. ...Petitioner/Appellant
AND
...Respondent/Complainants
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that inthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the order Dated 14-02-2018 passed by the learned IllAdditional Sessions Judge, at Rajampet, in CrI.RC. No. 51 of 2016 confirming the quantum of maintenance granted in M.C. No. 2 of 2011, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of l-Class, at Railway Kodur,
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that inthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to order stay of all further ProceedingsinCrI.MP.No.2088of2016 in MC No. 2 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of l-Class, at Railway Kodur, filed for enforcement of the Order Dated: 04-08-2016,
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. Ch. Swapna Priya Rep for Sri Venkateswarlu Chakkilam ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the RespondentNo.1 and Sri. MSP Kamaraju Advocate for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.5605 OF 2018
ORDER:
Ms. Ch.Swapna Priya, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the matterhasbecome infructuous. Learned counsel made an endorsement on the bundle, to that effect.
In view of the said submission, the present Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendinginthis
Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
SD/- K KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
PR sree
m
N V
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/01/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.5605 of 2018
8 Copfes
zehlzij.
05L
•: -I'
•)
3 0 APR 2023
7
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Thummadi Bhadraiah
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Thummadi Lalithamma
Thummadi Hima Bindu
Thummadi Tejaswini
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
