Contempt case alleging wilful disobedience of a writ order directing payment of salary arrears. Respondents' counsel stated arrears were paid and petitioner admitted compliance. The Court closed the contempt case with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATiRS.
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY o.c koc
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
6- o
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No. 4170 OF 2023
Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of ContemptofCourtsAct 1971 pleased to punish the Respondents for intentional, deliberately and willfully disobeying the orders passed by this Hon'ble court in WP.No.9111/2020 dt. 21-04-2023.
Between:
Chintala Nageswara Rao„ S/o. Sanyasi Patrudu, Aged about. 35 years, Occ. Shift Operator, O/o 33/11KV,Tuni Sub-station, APEPDCL, Tuni, East Godavari District.
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. SEENA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: SRI METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI G.V.S. KISHORE KUMAR
The Court made the following: ORDER
fv 4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.4170 OF 2023
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that, as directed by this Court, the respondents have paid thearrearsof the salary to the petitioner herein.
Learned counsel for the petitioner admitted the same.
As the orders of this Court have been complied with. therefore, nothing remains in the contempt case to adjudicate.
Hence, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shallbeno order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendinginthis
case shall stand closed.
/
SD/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTI OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/01/2024
ORDER
CC.No.4170 of 2023
Closing the Contempt Case Without Costs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case should be closed as the respondents have complied with the Court's earlier order directing payment of salary arrears.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chintala Nageswara Rao
Sri Prudvi Teja Imandi
A. Ravi Kumar
Sri T.V.S.N. Murthy
Sri K.Vijayanand
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
