A Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition seeking quash of an interim/family court order was disposed of after counsel stated the cause did not survive and the petition had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 468 OF 2019
Between:
Vanja Sridhar Babu, S/o. Late Pitchiah, Aged about 40 years, Rio. D.No.85-5365, 3 Rd Lane, Kodanda Ramaiah Nagar, Chuttugunta, Nallapadu,Guntur.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
AND
...Respondent
(Respondents 3 and 4 are being minors rep by theirMother/Guardian/2 nd Respondent)
...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS
0
f
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that inthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Order dated 17-12-2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.121 of 2018 in F.C.O.P.No.115 of 2018 on the file of FamilyCourtcumXIIAdditional District Court, Guntur District, Guntur
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumentsofSri M. Ram Prasad, Advocate rep for Sri K Srinivas ,Advocate forthe Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1
The Court made the following ORDER:
r»
[3333]
f r
APHC010022572019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE honourable smt justice V.SUJATHA
r-piMiMAi petition NO: 468/2019
Between;
Vanja Sridhar Babu
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused;
...RESP0NDENT/C0MPLA1NANT{S)
1.KSR1N1VAS Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1 .PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following;
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking quash of order dated 17.12.2018 against the petitioner/respondent in CrI.M.P No.121 of 2018 in F.C.O.P No.115 of 2018 on the file of the Family Court Cum XII Additional District Court, Guntur District.
- Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Mr. M.Ram Prasad learned counsel representing Mr. K.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause in the petition does not surviveand the matter has become infructuous.
- Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petitionisdismissedas infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- B. PRASAD RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Skm
HIGH COURT
DATED:09/09/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.468 of 2019
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vanja Sridhar Babu
The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Public Prosecutor
Vanja Sireesha
Vanja Lahari
Vanja Gokul Kailash
V.Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
