Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of an order dated 16.11.2023. Respondents submitted they had complied with the order. The Court accepted the submission and closed the case without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
f
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT A
mi c>
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 856 OF 2024
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the Hon’ble High Court Orders dated 16.11.2023 passed in WP No. 11629 of 2023.
Between:
Avutala Sailaja, W/o. A Rama Krishna Reddy, Aged about 68 years, Occ Contractor, R/o. 5-117, Bandi Atmakur, Kurnool District.
...PETITIONER/ WRIT PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT Nos. 1 to 4
Counsel for the PetltionerSRI. BATHALA RAMESH
Counsel for the Respondent No.1,3 & 4: SMT. S. SIVA KUMARI
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI. S. NAGARAJU
The Court made the following; ORDER
APHC010060332024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3329] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 856/2024
Between:
Avutala Sailaja ...PETITIONER
AND
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar las and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
/
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.BATHALARAMESH
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.S NAGARAJU
2.S SIVA KUMARl
The Court made the following Order:
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwillfuldisobedience of the orders dated 16.11.2023 passed by this CourtinW.P.No.11629of2023.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have complied with the order dated 16.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.11629of2023andhence,no further orders are required to be passed in the contemptcase.
Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents,
the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt
case shall stand closed.
SD/- V. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// / SECTION OFFICER
To.
HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2024
ORDER
CC.No.856 of 2024
.•o>
Ok
nn|;
til i 4 SEP 2u;!t
PATCVi^^J^
CLOSING THE CC
WITHOUT COSTS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be allowed given that the respondents claim to have complied with the earlier order.
Whether any punishment under the Contempt of Courts Act is necessary.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Avutala Sailaja
Shashi Bhushan Kumar
Shamsheer Singh Rawat
P. Reddy Sekhar Reddy
E Thirumaleshwar Reddy
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
