Contempt petition filed for alleged willful disobedience of earlier High Court orders. The court noted submission by the petitioner that the orders had been complied with and closed the case without costs.
Contempt case closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE No: 451 OF 2024
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of CourtsAct 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents underSec.10to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentionalandwillfulviolation of the Hon’ble High Court Orders dated 11.12.2023 passedinW.P.No.357 of 2023.
Between;
Sree Manddali Enterprises, Partner Sanaka Kota Venkata Renuka Ravi Vara Prasad S/o. Naga Basavaiah, Aged about 38 years, R/o.D.No.1-2 Nagayalanka Village and Mandal, Krishna District.
...PETITIONER AND
v -
... RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 3, 5 & 6: SMT. SSIVAKUMARI
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI. C. SUMON
The Court made the following Order:
1
APHC010045062024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3329]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 451/2024
Between:
Sree Manddali Enterprises
...PETITIONER
AND
Sri Sasi Bhushan Kumar las and Others ...CONTEMNOR{S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.S SIVA KUMARI
2.0 SUMON
The Court made the following Order:
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwillfuldisobedience
of the orders dated 11.12.2023 passed by this CourtinW.P.No.357of2023.
Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 18.06.2024, respondent No.3 appeared in person and pleaded that the order of this Court has been complied with.
Hence, appearance of respondent No.3 is hereby dispensed with until further orders.
2
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 11.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.357 of 2023, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
SD/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
r» o u'.. A r/^Di ir'i
HIGH COURT
DATED: 04/07/2024
ORDER
CC.No.451 of 2024
CLOSING THE C.C. WITHOUT COSTS.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents have complied with the High Court orders dated 11.12.2023?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sree Manddali Enterprises
Sri Sasi Bhushan Kumar IAS, State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government Irrigation and CAD Water Resources Department
Sri Shamsher Singh Rawat, State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government Finance Department
Sri Raja babu, District Collector
Sri Sasi Bhushan Kumar, Commissioner, Command Development Authority
T.J.H Prasad Babu, Superintending Engineer
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
