Dismissed

Bandrothu Ramachandrarao v. Sri Sasi Bhushan Kumar IAS

Andhra Pradesh HC4 Jul 2024CC/468/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-Judge High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati closed Contempt Case No.468 of 2024. Upon hearing counsel, the Court was satisfied that Respondents had complied with a prior order. Personal appearance was dispensed with and the case was dismissed without costs.

What did the court decide?

The petition was closed with no order as to costs and no personal appearance required.

Bandrothu Ramachandrarao Vs Sri Sasi Bhushan Kumar… — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶4

CONTEMPT CASE No.468 OF 2024

¶5

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filehereintheHigh} Court may be pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate^{violationofFinalorder} passed in WP No.27732/2023 dated 27.11.2023.

¶6

Between:

¶7

Bandrothu Ramachandrarao, S/o. Chinna Ramaiah, Aged about 58 years R/o.D.No.1-23, Madaarpuram, Veldurthi Mandal, Kumool^District.

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

Sri. Sasi Bhushan Kumar, IAS, The State of Andhra Pradesh,^Repbyits Principal Secretary to Government Irrigation and CAD^{WaterResources} Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,^{GunturDistrict.}

¶11

Sri. Shamsher Singh Rawat, The State of Andhra Pradesh,^Repbyits Principal Secretary to Government Finance Department,^A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶12

Sri. Dr. G.Srijana, IAS, The District Collector,^{Kurnool,KurnoolDistrict.} 4. P Reddy Sekhar Reddy, The Superintendent of Engineer,^Water Resources Department, Irrigation Circle, Kurnool District.

¶13

P Reddy Sekhar Reddy, The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, M.l Works Division, Kurnool District

¶14

...respondents

¶15

; SRI ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,4 & 5 : SMT S SIVA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI C SUMON The Court made the following ORDER ;

¶16

APHC010045082024

¶17

SEH

¶18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3329] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶19

FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 468/2024

¶21

Between:

¶22

...PETITIONER

¶23

Bandrothu Ramachandrarao

¶24

AND ...CONTEMNOR(S)

¶25

Sri Sasi Bhushan Kumar las and Others

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶27

1.ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.S SIVA KUMARl 2.CSUMON

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER:

¶29

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned^{counselforthe} respondents.

¶30

In view of the order of this Court dated 04,04.2024, respondents Nos. 3 to 5 appeared before this Court and pleaded that the^{ordersofthisCourthas} been complied with and that their non-appearance on^{18.03.2024wasduetoa} mistake of fact, which will not be repeated in the^{future.Thelearnedcounselfor} the petitioner reiterated the compliance as reported^{bythelearnedcounselfor} the respondents.

¶31

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the personal appearance of respondents Nos. 3 to 5 is hereby dispensed^with. 4. In view of the compliance reported by the both counsels, no cause survives for further adjudication of the matter and^{thepresentContemptCaseis} liable to be closed.

¶32

5, Regarding the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

SD/- V.DIWAKAR

DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTTON OFFICER

To,

Sri. Sasi Bhushan Kumar, IAS, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government Irrigation and CAD Water Resources

¶41

Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶42

Sri. Shamsher Singh Rawat, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government Finance Department,^A.P.

¶43

Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶44

Sri. Dr. G.Srijana, IAS, The District Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District.

¶45

Sri. P Reddy Sekhar Reddy, The Superintendent of Engineer, Water Resources Department, Irrigation Circle, Kurnool District.

¶46

Sri. P Reddy Sekhar Reddy, The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, M.l Works Division, Kurnool District

¶47

One CC to Sri. Annamneedi Balakrishna, Advocate [OPUC

¶48

One CC to Smt. S. Siva Kumari, Advocate [OPUC

¶49

One CC to Sri. C. Sumon, Advocate [OPUO

¶50

Three CD Copies

TAC

-r

HIGH COURT

DATED:05/07/2024

ORDER

CC.No.468 of 2024

%
^ Current2 7 SEPSection20?^ ^ Pj

¶58

CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED

Bandrothu Ramachandrarao v. Sri Sasi Bhushan Kumar IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bandrothu Ramachandrarao v. Sri Sasi Bhushan Kumar IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sree Manddali Enterprises Vs Sri Sasi Bhushan Kumar IAS

A Venkata Subba Reddy Vs Shashi Bhushan Kumar

Sri Sridevi Constructions Vs the State of Ap

P Israel Raju Vs S Satish Kumar

V Ramanjaneyulu Vs Sri. Sasi Bhushan Kumar

The Wua President Vs Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar IAS