Contempt case alleging willful violation of a writ order; respondents reported compliance with the court's order, personal appearance of respondents was dispensed with, and the contempt case was closed.
Contempt case closed on reported compliance; personal appearance of respondents Nos. 3 to 5 dispensed with; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
c
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 456 OF 2024
Between:
V Ramanjaneyulu, S/o. V Linganna, Aged about 42 years.R/o. D. No. 2-113, Sudepalli, Veldurthi Mandal, Kurnool District
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 29376/2023 dated 06.12.2023 by Hon’ble High Court
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the copy of the order dated 06.12.2023 passed in W.P. No. 29376 of 2023
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Annamneedi Balakrishna
Counsel for the Respondents Nos. 1, 3 to 5: Smt. S Siva Kumari
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: Sri. C Sumon
The Court made the following : Order
\
APHC010045072024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3329]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 456/2024
Between:
\
V Ramanjaneyulu ...PETITIONER
AND Sri Sasi Bhushan Kumar and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.SSIVAKUMARI 2.0 SUMON
The Court made the following: ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learnedcounselforthe respondents.
- Regarding the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and iearned counsel for the respondents, the present Contempt Case is ciosed. There shall be no order as to costs.
V
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD/-K.TATA RAO
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
/
//TRUE COPY//
y- ^ SECTION OFFICER
To,
SAM
■ ^
HIGH COURT
DATED:05/07/2024
ORDER
CC.No.456 of 2024
o
o
^ •'Ifp ,2
202^,
o
CLOSING THIS CONTEMPT CASE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V Ramanjaneyulu
Sri Sasi Bhushan Kumar
Sri Shamsher Singh Rawat
Dr. G. Srijana
P Reddy Sekhar Reddy
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
