A contempt petition challenging violation of a February 2023 order was closed because the court recorded a submission that the respondent had complied with the earlier order, rendering no punishment necessary.
The contempt case is closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1620 OF 2024
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondentforhis willful and deliberate violation of the order made by this Honourable Court dated 06.01.2023.
Between:
P Israel Raju, S/o. Baburao, Hindu, Aged about 48 years,Occ;Constable (Dismissed from Service), R/o D.No.20/28, Near Jaggayya Cheruvu, Pithapuram Town and Mandal, East Godavari District.
...PETITIONER
AND
S Satish Kumar, S/o. Subramani, Aged about 35 years,Occ; Superintendent of Police, Kakinada District, R/o. Kakinada.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI A K KISHORE REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents :
The Court made the following ORDER :
I
APHC010122882024
g.L.g IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1620/2024
Between:
P Israel Raju ...PETITIONER
AND
S Satish Kumar ...CONTEMNOR
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.A K KISHORE REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor:
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwillful disobedience of the orders dated 06.01.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.30857 of 2021.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri G.Raghavendra Pavan, learned counsel representing Sri A.K.Kishore Reddy, learned counsel for the petitionersubmits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 06.01.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.30857 of2021 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
SD/- V.DIWAKAR
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
TAC
HIGH COURT
DATED: 05/07/2024
ORDER
m
g 2 7 AUG 202't % Co
CC.No.1620 of 2024
.CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P Israel Raju
S Satish Kumar
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
