First appeal against a decree in a property suit was withdrawn by the appellant on her instructions and dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
APPEAL SUIT NO: 626 OF 2009
Appeal under Section 96 of CPC., appeal against the judgment and decree dated 05-08-2009 in O.S.No. 301 of 2005 on the file of the 1st Additional District Judge, Guntur.
Between;
Dande Vimala, W/o. Srinivasa Rao, hindu House-wife R/o. Rentachintala Village & Mandal, Gurazala Mandal, GunturDistrict.
...APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF
AND
...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
Counsel for the Appellant : SRI CH VIDYASAGAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI ADDEPALLI SURYANARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondents Nos 4 to 6 : SRI HARISH KUMAR T
The Court made the following JUDGMENT :
APHC010143122009
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3369]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
APPEAL SUIT No: 626/2009
Between:
Dande Vimala
...APPELLANT
AND
Neeli Chandraiah and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.CH VIDYASAGAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.ADDEPALLI SURYANARAYANA
2.HARISH KUMAR.T
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT:
The Appeal Suit is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 05.08.2009, passed in O.S.No.301 of 2005,onthe file of the learned I Additional District Judge, Guntur.
- Learned counsel for the appellant is present. None appeared for the respondents.
- Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal as per the instructions received from the appellant.
Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand
closed.
SDI- K.TATA RAO
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
TAC
HIGH COURT DATED: 16/12/2024
ORDER
AS.No.626 of 2009
I 2JMAR 2025 ^
^ ^ Curreni Section
DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS WITHDRAWN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dande Vimala
Neeli Chandraiah
Neeli Sankara Rao
Sukhamanchu Adilakshmi
Neeli Brahmaramaba
Neeli Venkaiah
T Mallikarjuna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
