The Single Judge dismissed an appeal filed under Section 96 CPC against a judgment dated 22.12.2012, holding that the cause did not survive as the appellant submitted a Memorandum of Compromise, indicating the matter was settled. No order as to costs was passed.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
<br>
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
AS NO: 697 OF 2013
Appeal filed under Section 96 of the C.P.C, the judgmentanddecree dated 22.12.2012 passed in OS.no. 130/2004 on the fileoftheCourtofthe Additional Civil (Senior Division) Judge, Kurnool,as it relates to item No.1 of the plaint schedule property in the interest of justice*
Between:
...Appellants
AND
Occupation: Business R/o. Alampur Town, Alampur Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District.
Occupation Housewife R/o. D.No. 15/208, Khadakpura STreet, Kurnool Town and District.
...Respondents / Respondents
I.A, NO: 2 OF 2013(ASMP. NO: 1984 OF 2013^
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings on the judgment and decree dated: 22/12/2012 in O.S.No. 130/04, on the file of the court of the Principal Civil Judge, Kurnool.
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. Mirza Nisar Ahmed Baig
Counsel for the Respondent No.s 2 & 3 : SRI. V. V SATISH
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
if ■9
APHC010647622013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3369]
MONDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
APPEAL SUIT NO: 697/2013
Between:
Sri S.basha (died) & 6 Others and Others
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
Sri S Haji Mian And 5 Others and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1.CORPUS JURIS LAW PANEL LLP
2.MIRZA NISAR AHMED BAIG
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.M MEHDI HUSSAIN
2.KSITA RAM
3..
4.VVSATISH
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
- This Appeal was filed by the appellant/defendant No.1 under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 22.12,2012 passed in O.S.No.130 of 2004 on the file of learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool.
- Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of the respondents. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
PR
vna
HIGH COURT
DATED:16/12/2024
JUDGMENT
AS.No.697 of 2013
iP
2 8 DEC 202'i m/j
^ . Current Section .
DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS WITHDRAWN
WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC should be disposed of as withdrawn upon submission of a Memorandum of Compromise in the subordinate court.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri S. Basha (Died) & 6 Others
Sri S. Haji Mian And 5 Others
T Mallikarjuna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
