This order dismisses a writ petition challenging denial of Anganwadi work functions as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
&
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 1933 OF 2015
Between:
Smt. Kethana Boyina Lakshnii Devi, (selected Mini Anganwadi Worker), W/o. Radhakrishna, Age 30 years, R/o. Balavengana Palli, Veligandla Mandal, Prakasam District.
...Petitioner
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not accepting the joining report submitted on 27.11.2014 by the petitioner herein and not allowing her to discharge the functions of Mini Anganwadi Worker though an appointment is made vide appointment order dt. 26.11.2014 as illegal, high handed and violative Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution, of India and consequently direct the respondents more specifically the respondent no. 3 & 4 to allow the petitioner to discharge the functions of Mini Anganwadi Worker, Balayenganapalli Anganwadi Centre while receiving and accepting the Joining report submitted on 27.11.2014 forthwith.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may. be pleased to receive the counter copies on record by allowing the leave petition in the above writ petition.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 2593 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to accept the petitioners joining report and provisionally allow the petitioner to discharge the functions of Mini Anganwadi Worker while disposing of petitioners representation dt. 22.12.2014.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. TENEPALLI NIRANJAN Counsel for this Respondents : GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD WELFARE
The Court made the following: ORDER
r
z
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No. 1933 of 2015
ORDER:
Sri.T.Niranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive as such the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ
Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- M PADMALATHA //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. Tenepalli Niranjan Advocate [OPUC] 2. Jndhra Prade?^ [OUtT°'"®" Child Welfare, High Court of 3. Two CD Copies PV MSR
HIGH COURT
DATED :02/03/2023
ORDER
WP.No.1933 of 2015
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Smt. Kethana Boyina Lakshnii Devi
State of Andhra Pradesh
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
