Dismissed

Velagapudi Naga Anoop v. The State of A.P.

Andhra Pradesh HC20 Dec 2023CRLP/4544/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court heard a Criminal Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C seeking modification of a bail condition. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the matter had become infructuous due to pending proceedings. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions stand closed.

Velagapudi Naga Anoop Vs The State of A.P. — Bail and Remand | Andhra Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4544 OF 2018

¶7

Between:

¶8

Velagapudi Naga Anoop, S/o. Bhaktavasthala Rao, Hindu, Aged about 35 yeare, F^o. Flat No. 504, A Block, 3^ Line, Ayyappa Nagar, Vijayawada Krishna District.

¶9

...Petitioner/AI

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of A.P., Through the Station House Officer, Rompicherla Police Station, Guntur District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, For the State of Andhra Pradesh

¶12

...Respondent/Complainant

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to modify the condition of depositing of passport of the Petitioner vide order dated 14-03-2018 passed in CrI.M.P. No.336 of 2018 on the file of the Hon ble XIII Additional Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet, Guntur District, in Crime No. 5 of 2018 on the file of the S.H.O., Rompicherla P.S., Guntur District.

¶14

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G. L. Nageswar Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.

¶15

The Court made the following:

¶16

¶17

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶18

CRIMINAL PETITION No.4544 OF 2018

¶19

ORDER:

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Learned counsel made an

¶21

endorsement on the bundle, to that effect.

¶22

In view of the said submission, the present Criminal

¶23

Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶24

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending^inthis

¶25

Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

¶26

To,

¶27

//TRUE COPY//

¶28

Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT/REGISTRAR

¶29

SECTION OFFICER

¶30

0 Thf ^ Narasaraopet. Guntur District. Thf ^ Sessions Judge: Narasaraopet. Guntur District. 4 OnP rr Police Station, Guntur District. 4. une CC to Sri G. L. Nageswar Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCS to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies SMA

ssb

' ^

HIGH COURT

•DATED:20/12/2023

ORDER

CRLP.No.4544 of 2018

DISMISSING THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUOUS

Velagapudi Naga Anoop v. The State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Velagapudi Naga Anoop v. The State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Bhaskar Reddy Vs State of Ap

M.Shaikshavali Vs State of Ap

Y.Mallikarjuna Reddy Vs State of Ap

V.Venkateswara Reddy Vs State of Ap

Mohana Satyanarayana Vs State of Ap.

Shaik Ghousunnisa at Gousiya Begum Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh